Skip to main content

Does God Have a Playbook or Just Perfect Stats?

 

Monday Night Football had me pondering theology. It started with the Commanders’ head coach, Dan Quinn, strutting onto the field, declaring his team would play aggressively—live on the edge! Twice, he went for it on 4th down. Twice, the analytics dashboard flashed a dire warning: "Coach, maybe punt?" Twice, he ignored the math. The result? Two painful turnovers. Ouch.

Sports, it seems, is increasingly run by the spreadsheet.  Look at baseball. Analytics practically runs the dugout now, dictating pitching matchups, defensive shifts, and even the calculated risk of walking in a run to avoid a grand slam. But I always admired guys like Tony La Russa who trusted their gut over the relentless spreadsheet. Sometimes, instinct does beat the algorithm. Sometimes, you just feel the fastball coming.

And then my brain did what it always does: it wandered directly into theology. Does God use analytics? If He does, I’m definitely riding the bench.

Think about it: How many times have I stopped to help someone versus the times I drove past without a glance? With the holidays rushing toward us, I’ll soon see bell ringers at every store and folks holding signs at every intersection. I can’t possibly give to everyone.

Does the Almighty keep a conversion rate on my compassion? Is there a divine dashboard tracking my good deeds? A prominent "Missed Opportunities" column on the scorecard?

And then there's language, oh boy. How many times have I let a colorful word slip? Does "Christian cussing" count against me, even if the phrasing was particularly funny?

Speaking of measurable sins, let’s talk commandments. George Carlin made us wonder, Why ten? Is it because Ten is neat? Ten is a decimal. Ten is measurable. It sounds official, like analytics. Eleven? Nobody would take that seriously. Similar to Thou shalt not wear white after Labor Day!

My mind drifts to the pinnacle of theological sci-fi: Star Trek V: The Final Frontier. Captain Kirk, standing before a being claiming to be God, asks the ultimate, brilliant question: "What does God need with a starship?"

If God is truly omnipotent and omniscient, why would He need a vessel, a vehicle, a method? That line isn't just sci-fi snark—it’s a profound challenge to blind faith and accepted authority. Kirk refuses to accept things at face value. He’s basically saying, “Show me the playbook.”

So, back to my core question: If God is all-knowing, does He need analytics? Or is omniscience the ultimate algorithm, the one that instantly calculates every variable without needing to consult a spreadsheet?  My hope? That grace outweighs my imperfect stats. Because if this is purely a numbers game, where my Win-Loss record has to qualify for the postseason, I’m pretty sure I won't make the playoffs.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Inclusion - Giving Students What They Need to Succeed

I officially surrendered my man card the day I said, “I do,” back in 1987.  Apparently, there are no returns. Yesterday I wept in my office. Not the dignified, single-tear kind of weeping. I’m talking full-on, reach-for-the-Kleenex, thank-God-the-door-is-closed weeping. We had just told a parent—whose child is on the spectrum—that we believe in her son, and we want him to stay at our school. Those words cost us something. They cost planning. They cost resources. They cost energy. But they didn’t cost us our mission. And here’s the irony: this conversation came on the heels of another one where I had to tell a “potential family” that we didn’t believe our school was the right fit for their children. Same day. Same office. Same principal. Two completely different outcomes. If you’ve ever wondered whether there’s an internal battle between a principal’s head and heart, let me assure you—it’s not theoretical. It’s daily. And sometimes it’s exhausting. Like most of my blogs, there’s a b...

On Humanity, Rumor, and the Discipline of Decency

Every so often, the world reminds us, sometimes gently, sometimes with a jolt, that God’s plan for us still runs through the old, unfashionable virtues: love, charity, humility, friendship. Not as slogans. As practices. Lately, the reminder hasn’t come through a clear, verified tragedy so much as through the way we react to rumor, outrage, and one another. In an age where headlines race ahead of facts and partisanship outpaces compassion, the simplest test of our humanity may be this: Do we refuse to cheer the suffering, real or rumored, of those we disagree with? I think about friendship across differences. Actor James Woods once said of director Rob Reiner that political differences never stood in the way of their love and respect for each other. Reiner fought for Woods when others wouldn’t. They worked together. They remained friends. That’s how it is in the real world, or at least how it should be. You don’t have to agree to stay human. I also think about families who live with add...

Reigniting the Fire: From Embers to Flame

  There’s a moment in an interview with Michael Franti that’s stayed with me. He spoke about how a roaring fire, once reduced to embers, doesn’t need much to come alive again, just a gentle breath, a little attention, a whisper of wind. And suddenly, the flame returns. That image, embers waiting patiently for someone to believe in their potential, feels deeply personal. Franti once said, “I think of love as an action. Finding something that’s outside of yourself, to serve someone else’s soul, helping to ignite someone else’s spirit, to bring about ease of heart and joy, serenity in somebody else.” That quote reminds me that reigniting a fire, whether in us or in others, is about connection. It’s about showing up, listening, and offering warmth when someone feels cold inside. Not long ago, I found myself in a place I never expected to be. The fire inside me had dimmed. Life hadn’t knocked me down in one dramatic blow; it had chipped away, little by little. Leadership challen...