Search This Blog

Thursday, February 26, 2026

Inclusion - Giving Students What They Need to Succeed


I officially surrendered my man card the day I said, “I do,” back in 1987. Apparently, there are no returns. Yesterday I wept in my office. Not the dignified, single-tear kind of weeping. I’m talking full-on, reach-for-the-Kleenex, thank-God-the-door-is-closed weeping. We had just told a parent—whose child is on the spectrum—that we believe in her son, and we want him to stay at our school.

Those words cost us something. They cost planning. They cost resources. They cost energy. But they didn’t cost us our mission.

And here’s the irony: this conversation came on the heels of another one where I had to tell a “potential family” that we didn’t believe our school was the right fit for their children. Same day. Same office. Same principal. Two completely different outcomes.

If you’ve ever wondered whether there’s an internal battle between a principal’s head and heart, let me assure you—it’s not theoretical. It’s daily. And sometimes it’s exhausting.

Like most of my blogs, there’s a back story. Inclusion isn’t just a buzzword to me. It’s personal. My grandson Cole is on the spectrum. My great-nephew Lucas has Down syndrome and is out there living life with joy that could evangelize a stadium. These aren’t case studies. They’re my people.

Recently, I saw a reel about the Rockwood School District featuring a former student of mine—an absolute rock star of a teacher—and her son, “Super Cooper,” who helps the assistant principal with bus duty every afternoon. I don’t know who needed that video more—me or the algorithm—but I felt it in my chest.

Because here’s the truth: when the conversation turns to special needs, I clock back in.

I try to clock out. I really do. My official school hours run roughly 7 a.m. to bedtime. Weekends are for parish events… unless we’re out of town… unless something comes up… which it always does. I tell myself I’m “off duty,” but if someone brings up inclusion at a funeral reception? Game on.

That happened last week. Between condolences and catching up with old grade school and prep school buddies, the topic shifted to special needs, someone’s deceased brother, a grandchild on the spectrum, and programs in parish schools. And I could feel the fire in one friend’s voice as he talked about the miracles happening through inclusive efforts in Catholic education.

That’s when I stop talking about academics and start talking about souls. Not methodologies. Not paperwork. Not funding formulas. Souls. This wasn’t about educational theory. It’s about whether we truly believe every child is made in the image and likeness of God—or whether that’s just something we print in the handbook.

I’ll be honest. There are still educators who quietly (and sometimes not-so-quietly) wonder if students with significant IEPs and extensive modifications are “fair” to the rest of the class.

When I hear that, my blood pressure does things that would concern my physician. My response is usually simple: “Take your glasses off and read the board from the back row.”

When you admit you can’t, I’ll hand them back to you. That’s not cheating.  That’s not lowering the standard. That’s giving you the tools you need to see.  If we’re willing to hand a child glasses, why wouldn’t we hand them the academic, social, or behavioral supports they need to flourish?

Inclusion doesn’t weaken a classroom. It humanizes it. Children who grow up learning beside classmates with different abilities don’t become resentful. They become compassionate. They learn patience. They learn creativity. They learn that strength doesn’t always look like straight A’s and varsity letters. They learn the Gospel without realizing it’s being taught.

Yes, programs like FIRE in Kansas City and One Classroom in St. Louis have helped schools make this possible. Grants matter. Training matters. Support matters. I’m grateful for the ways the Archdiocese of Kansas City–St. Joseph and St. Louis are leaning into this mission.

But what moved me to tears today wasn’t a program. It was a parent sitting across from us, bracing for bad news. It was the pause before we spoke. It was the moment her shoulders dropped when she realized her son wasn’t being shown the door. It was the sacred privilege of saying, “We see him. We believe in him. He belongs here.”

I don’t cry because inclusion is easy. I cry because it’s worth it. There will always be tension between prudence and compassion. Between capacity and calling. Between what makes sense on paper and what feels right in prayer.

But if we are going to call ourselves Catholic educators—if we are going to talk about human dignity, community, and the Body of Christ—then sometimes we have to live it in ways that stretch us. Sometimes that means saying no. Sometimes that means saying yes. Sometimes that means a middle-aged principal sitting in his office, dabbing his eyes, grateful that he gave up his man card decades ago.

Because if loving and fighting for kids like Cole, Lucas, Super Cooper, and the little boy in our office today costs me a few tears?  I’ll pay it every single time.

No comments:

Post a Comment

If the Marlboro Man Could Sing, He’d Be Alan Jackson

Somewhere between the Marlboro Man and modern masculinity stands a tall, quiet Georgian named Alan Jackson. The Marlboro Man didn’t talk muc...