Skip to main content

From Cat Stevens to Charlie Kirk: What Do We Lose When We Tune Out?


Yesterday, with the help of Gemini, I curated a playlist featuring some of my favorite songs spanning the 1970s to the early 2000s. The usual suspects made the cut: Dave Matthews Band, Al Stewart, Joe Jackson, Van Morrison, Joe Cocker, Jackson Browne, Paul Simon, Gerry Rafferty, and Jim Croce. You get the drift: soulful, storytelling-driven music that’s aged like fine wine.

Curious, I asked the AI who else might belong in this musical circle. Without hesitation, it suggested Cat Stevens. That name stirred something in me.

For years, I had a personal ban on the artist formerly known as Cat Stevens, who converted to Islam in 1977 and took the name Yusuf Islam. He was allegedly linked to the fatwa calling for harm against author Salman Rushdie, following the publication of The Satanic Verses. That association deeply troubled me. How could someone who wrote and sang “Peace Train” publicly support violence against a writer exercising free speech?

Out of confusion, hurt, and, if I’m honest, immaturity, I stopped listening to Cat Stevens altogether.

But as Gemini reminded me of the beauty in his music, “Peace Train,” “Wild World,” “Morning Has Broken,” “Oh Very Young,” “Father & Son”, I felt something shift. The 2025 edition of Greg Sturgill said, “Grow up. Reclaim the music you love.” So, I did. Even if these songs age me, I’ll listen to them proudly, even in public.

This reflection led me to a deeper question: What other artists, authors, or creators have I blocked out because of their flaws or controversial opinions? Truman Capote, Pete Townshend, Mel Gibson, Johnny Depp, Charlie Sheen, just a sampling. What would I have missed if I gave them the same treatment I gave Yusuf Islam?

Recently, I’ve seen similar divisions surrounding Charlie Kirk. I’ll admit, I know very little about him and have no desire to dig deeper. However, the public reaction to the tragedy surrounding him has, in my opinion, revealed some of the worst aspects of online discourse. It feels like a modern-day flashpoint—one that could tear communities apart. Companies are even firing employees for expressing their constitutionally protected beliefs.

So I ask you: Have you ever blocked someone or an entire group out of your life because of their character flaws or differing opinions? If so, what did you lose in the process?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Inclusion - Giving Students What They Need to Succeed

I officially surrendered my man card the day I said, “I do,” back in 1987.  Apparently, there are no returns. Yesterday I wept in my office. Not the dignified, single-tear kind of weeping. I’m talking full-on, reach-for-the-Kleenex, thank-God-the-door-is-closed weeping. We had just told a parent—whose child is on the spectrum—that we believe in her son, and we want him to stay at our school. Those words cost us something. They cost planning. They cost resources. They cost energy. But they didn’t cost us our mission. And here’s the irony: this conversation came on the heels of another one where I had to tell a “potential family” that we didn’t believe our school was the right fit for their children. Same day. Same office. Same principal. Two completely different outcomes. If you’ve ever wondered whether there’s an internal battle between a principal’s head and heart, let me assure you—it’s not theoretical. It’s daily. And sometimes it’s exhausting. Like most of my blogs, there’s a b...

On Humanity, Rumor, and the Discipline of Decency

Every so often, the world reminds us, sometimes gently, sometimes with a jolt, that God’s plan for us still runs through the old, unfashionable virtues: love, charity, humility, friendship. Not as slogans. As practices. Lately, the reminder hasn’t come through a clear, verified tragedy so much as through the way we react to rumor, outrage, and one another. In an age where headlines race ahead of facts and partisanship outpaces compassion, the simplest test of our humanity may be this: Do we refuse to cheer the suffering, real or rumored, of those we disagree with? I think about friendship across differences. Actor James Woods once said of director Rob Reiner that political differences never stood in the way of their love and respect for each other. Reiner fought for Woods when others wouldn’t. They worked together. They remained friends. That’s how it is in the real world, or at least how it should be. You don’t have to agree to stay human. I also think about families who live with add...

Reigniting the Fire: From Embers to Flame

  There’s a moment in an interview with Michael Franti that’s stayed with me. He spoke about how a roaring fire, once reduced to embers, doesn’t need much to come alive again, just a gentle breath, a little attention, a whisper of wind. And suddenly, the flame returns. That image, embers waiting patiently for someone to believe in their potential, feels deeply personal. Franti once said, “I think of love as an action. Finding something that’s outside of yourself, to serve someone else’s soul, helping to ignite someone else’s spirit, to bring about ease of heart and joy, serenity in somebody else.” That quote reminds me that reigniting a fire, whether in us or in others, is about connection. It’s about showing up, listening, and offering warmth when someone feels cold inside. Not long ago, I found myself in a place I never expected to be. The fire inside me had dimmed. Life hadn’t knocked me down in one dramatic blow; it had chipped away, little by little. Leadership challen...