Skip to main content

Right Person, Wrong Time… or Right Time, Different Me?

Image
By

I’ve been having one of those internal debates again—the kind that usually ends up becoming a blog, whether I planned it or not.

It started simply enough. In my line of work, I meet a lot of people every week. Recently, around the time of First Communion, I met some grandparents I’d somehow never crossed paths with before. At the same time, I’ve been a little less rigid about who I accept on social media, which has opened the door to friends of friends, siblings of friends, and even people I technically knew years ago but never really took the time to get to know.

If I’m being honest, that part sits with me. Because there are people, good people, I probably should’ve been more open to back in high school or college. Not because anything went wrong… but because nothing really went anywhere. The conversations stayed shallow. The connection never had a chance to become anything more.

That’s on me.  I’ve grown since then. Slowed down a bit. Softened in the right ways. Learned how to actually see people instead of just passing through moments with them. Which is where the debate kicks in.

There’s a song by Toby Keith that always makes me smile when this thought hits: “I ain’t as good as I once was… I got a few years on me now.”

And yeah… that sucks. The truth is, there are two very different versions of me. There’s the younger me—carefree, bold, maybe a little louder than necessary. Potential to be the life of the party. Quick on my feet. Always moving. The kind of guy who could walk into a room and make an impression.

Then there’s the version of me now. Not as fast. Not as light. A few more miles on the tires. But wiser. More grounded. A lot more aware of what actually matters. A softer soul. A better listener. The kind of man who doesn’t just meet people, but has the capacity to care about them.

So here’s the question I keep circling: Which version of me would people actually want in their lives?

The fun, high-energy version? Or the slower, steadier, more intentional one? At first glance, it feels like the younger version had the advantage. He was easier to like. Easier to be around. Probably more memorable in the moment.

But the more I sit with it, the more I think that version of me was built for attention… not necessarily for connection. Attention is easy to win. Connection takes something else entirely.

The man I was back then might’ve filled a room. But I’m not sure he could’ve built something that lasted in it. The man I am now? He’s not trying to impress anyone. But he’s a whole lot more capable of showing up, staying present, and actually investing in the people in front of him. That changes everything.

So maybe the real answer is this: It’s not that I missed out on people back then. It’s that I wasn’t ready for them—and maybe they weren’t ready for me. If those connections had started earlier, there’s a good chance they would’ve stayed exactly where they began—on the surface.

Now, there’s depth available. Not because the people are different… but because I am. Maybe that’s how it’s supposed to work. Maybe life doesn’t just bring people into our path randomly. It may bring them back around when we finally have the capacity to meet them properly.

So no—I’m probably not as quick as I once was. Not as sharp. Not as impressive at first glance. I’d like to think I’m something better now. More intentional. More present. More real.

If given the choice, I think I’d rather be the kind of person someone can build a friendship with… than just someone they remember meeting once. In the end, it’s not about who would’ve liked me more back then. It’s about who I’m capable of being for people now.

And that version of me? He’s finally worth getting to know.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Inclusion - Giving Students What They Need to Succeed

By
I officially surrendered my man card the day I said, “I do,” back in 1987.  Apparently, there are no returns. Yesterday I wept in my office. Not the dignified, single-tear kind of weeping. I’m talking full-on, reach-for-the-Kleenex, thank-God-the-door-is-closed weeping. We had just told a parent—whose child is on the spectrum—that we believe in her son, and we want him to stay at our school. Those words cost us something. They cost planning. They cost resources. They cost energy. But they didn’t cost us our mission. And here’s the irony: this conversation came on the heels of another one where I had to tell a “potential family” that we didn’t believe our school was the right fit for their children. Same day. Same office. Same principal. Two completely different outcomes. If you’ve ever wondered whether there’s an internal battle between a principal’s head and heart, let me assure you—it’s not theoretical. It’s daily. And sometimes it’s exhausting. Like most of my blogs, there’s a b...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Humanity, Rumor, and the Discipline of Decency

By
Every so often, the world reminds us, sometimes gently, sometimes with a jolt, that God’s plan for us still runs through the old, unfashionable virtues: love, charity, humility, friendship. Not as slogans. As practices. Lately, the reminder hasn’t come through a clear, verified tragedy so much as through the way we react to rumor, outrage, and one another. In an age where headlines race ahead of facts and partisanship outpaces compassion, the simplest test of our humanity may be this: Do we refuse to cheer the suffering, real or rumored, of those we disagree with? I think about friendship across differences. Actor James Woods once said of director Rob Reiner that political differences never stood in the way of their love and respect for each other. Reiner fought for Woods when others wouldn’t. They worked together. They remained friends. That’s how it is in the real world, or at least how it should be. You don’t have to agree to stay human. I also think about families who live with add...
1 comment
Read more

Reigniting the Fire: From Embers to Flame

By
  There’s a moment in an interview with Michael Franti that’s stayed with me. He spoke about how a roaring fire, once reduced to embers, doesn’t need much to come alive again, just a gentle breath, a little attention, a whisper of wind. And suddenly, the flame returns. That image, embers waiting patiently for someone to believe in their potential, feels deeply personal. Franti once said, “I think of love as an action. Finding something that’s outside of yourself, to serve someone else’s soul, helping to ignite someone else’s spirit, to bring about ease of heart and joy, serenity in somebody else.” That quote reminds me that reigniting a fire, whether in us or in others, is about connection. It’s about showing up, listening, and offering warmth when someone feels cold inside. Not long ago, I found myself in a place I never expected to be. The fire inside me had dimmed. Life hadn’t knocked me down in one dramatic blow; it had chipped away, little by little. Leadership challen...
2 comments
Read more