Skip to main content

Are They Artists? (Or Are We Just Moving the Goalposts?)

 

We all know the “masters,” right? Leonardo da Vinci. Raphael. The whole crew, basically the original Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, minus the pizza and sewer lair.

History handed them the title: Artists. Capital A. No debate. But then things get… blurry. Fast forward a few centuries, and now we’re staring at soup cans from Andy Warhol, paint splatters from Jackson Pollock, and rural Americana from Grandma Moses… and someone, somewhere, had to say: “Yep. That’s art.” Everyone else just kind of nodded along… eventually.

So, where’s the line now? Is Bob Ross a master artist because of his wet-on-wet technique… or because he made millions of people believe they could be artists too?

What about the graffiti artist turning a brick wall into a statement piece? (And depending on who you ask, either a visionary… or a vandal.)

What about the sidewalk chalk artist who creates a 3D illusion so real you hesitate to step on it? They know their "masterpiece" is gone with the first refreshing rain.

Do we consider the person with a spray can and a blowtorch, turning a plain jacket into something nobody else on earth owns? We all see them on TikTok or FB reels!

How about the sand sculptor—building something breathtaking… knowing full well the tide is coming to erase it like it never existed?

Then there’s this question… What about you? The one dabbling in woodworking. Trying the Bob Ross method. Learning watercolor. Playing with ink. Does “dabbling” disqualify you, or does it quietly put you in the same room as the rest of them?

Let’s make it uncomfortable for a second, are doodlers artists? You know the ones filling notebook margins during meetings, phone calls, sermons… (no judgment… mostly). No gallery. No training. No audience. Just a pen… and something inside that won’t sit still. Is that art?

Maybe we’ve been asking the wrong question. We keep asking: What makes an artist? Talent? Training? Recognition? Money? A museum wall? What if it’s simpler—and more unsettling—than that?

What if it’s this: An artist is anyone who feels the need to create… and does something about it. Not perfectly. Not professionally. Not profitably. Just… honestly.

Which leads to the question we can’t dodge: Is there an artist in all of us? Or have some of us just gotten really good at ignoring it?

Because maybe the difference between Leonardo da Vinci… and the person sketching during a Zoom call, isn’t talent. Maybe it’s permission.

Some people create masterpieces that hang in museums. Some create moments that wash away with the tide. Some create things no one ever sees. But if it moved you to make it… and it meant something while you did…who exactly are we to say that isn’t art?

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Inclusion - Giving Students What They Need to Succeed

I officially surrendered my man card the day I said, “I do,” back in 1987.  Apparently, there are no returns. Yesterday I wept in my office. Not the dignified, single-tear kind of weeping. I’m talking full-on, reach-for-the-Kleenex, thank-God-the-door-is-closed weeping. We had just told a parent—whose child is on the spectrum—that we believe in her son, and we want him to stay at our school. Those words cost us something. They cost planning. They cost resources. They cost energy. But they didn’t cost us our mission. And here’s the irony: this conversation came on the heels of another one where I had to tell a “potential family” that we didn’t believe our school was the right fit for their children. Same day. Same office. Same principal. Two completely different outcomes. If you’ve ever wondered whether there’s an internal battle between a principal’s head and heart, let me assure you—it’s not theoretical. It’s daily. And sometimes it’s exhausting. Like most of my blogs, there’s a b...

On Humanity, Rumor, and the Discipline of Decency

Every so often, the world reminds us, sometimes gently, sometimes with a jolt, that God’s plan for us still runs through the old, unfashionable virtues: love, charity, humility, friendship. Not as slogans. As practices. Lately, the reminder hasn’t come through a clear, verified tragedy so much as through the way we react to rumor, outrage, and one another. In an age where headlines race ahead of facts and partisanship outpaces compassion, the simplest test of our humanity may be this: Do we refuse to cheer the suffering, real or rumored, of those we disagree with? I think about friendship across differences. Actor James Woods once said of director Rob Reiner that political differences never stood in the way of their love and respect for each other. Reiner fought for Woods when others wouldn’t. They worked together. They remained friends. That’s how it is in the real world, or at least how it should be. You don’t have to agree to stay human. I also think about families who live with add...

Reigniting the Fire: From Embers to Flame

  There’s a moment in an interview with Michael Franti that’s stayed with me. He spoke about how a roaring fire, once reduced to embers, doesn’t need much to come alive again, just a gentle breath, a little attention, a whisper of wind. And suddenly, the flame returns. That image, embers waiting patiently for someone to believe in their potential, feels deeply personal. Franti once said, “I think of love as an action. Finding something that’s outside of yourself, to serve someone else’s soul, helping to ignite someone else’s spirit, to bring about ease of heart and joy, serenity in somebody else.” That quote reminds me that reigniting a fire, whether in us or in others, is about connection. It’s about showing up, listening, and offering warmth when someone feels cold inside. Not long ago, I found myself in a place I never expected to be. The fire inside me had dimmed. Life hadn’t knocked me down in one dramatic blow; it had chipped away, little by little. Leadership challen...