Skip to main content

Khakis, Cartoon Ties, and the Kingdom of God

I have never really left Catholic schools. Not for any meaningful stretch of time. Which means I have lived most of my life in a world of uniforms.

Uniforms are countercultural now. They whisper discipline in a culture that screams expression. They suggest order in a world that celebrates stretch. Trust me, middle schoolers attempt to stretch every conceivable line of that dress code. Hemlines. Sleeve lengths. Sock colors. The theological limits of what “solid navy” actually means. But we have uniforms. And teachers? We are supposed to model professionalism.

Ninety percent of my days look like this: khaki chinos, button-down shirt, tie (novelty on most days), fun socks, and tennis shoes about half the time because recess duty is cardio.

On Mondays, I let teachers wear jeans for a cause. Two dollars toward a charity or a scholarship fund. Mercy, but make it denim.

Then came a funeral. Most of the gentlemen wore suit jackets or blazers. Ties were optional. A friend from Houston leaned over and said, “I thought ties were a thing of the past?” A friend from California stopped by Goodwill to piece together a suit. For him, a tie was not optional. It was respect.

For me? If it is a day that begins with M, T, W, TH, or F, I am wearing a tie. Neck, bolo, or bow. Cartoon or classic. For the funeral, the Minions stayed home. I wore a grown-up tie.

This Saturday, I spent the day at the Robotics Jamboree at a local Jesuit high school; the mentors and teachers were in jeans, robotics shirts, and quarter-zips with the school crest. Relaxed. Productive. Engaged. Except for the religious sisters, bless their hearts, who looked like they stepped out of The Flying Nun.

The room buzzed with learning. Nobody looked underdressed. Nobody looked sloppy. They looked competent and comfortable.

I used to ask student ambassadors to wear their “Sunday best” at school events. I’ve softened on that. Have you seen what families wear to Mass now? Some students show up in sports uniforms because they’re heading straight to tournaments. At least they went to Mass. There is something admirable in that.

Which leads me to the question I’ve been quietly wrestling: Do clothes shape the culture, or does the culture shape the clothes?

Music has opinions. (ZZ Top) Sharp Dressed Man tells us every girl is crazy about one.
(Justin Timberlake) Suit & Tie insists confidence lives in the lapels. (The Kinks) Dedicated Follower of Fashion mocks obsession with trends. (Bowie) Fashion turns style into performance art. (Elvis) Blue Suede Shoes made footwear sacred.

And then there’s the old proverb: “Clothes make the man.”  Even Oscar Wilde once quipped that a well-tied tie is a serious step in life.

Is it or is it fabric stitched to habit?  Here is what I’m starting to suspect. Clothing does communicate. It always has. It signals respect. Intent. Occasion. Effort.

However, clothing does not create virtue.  A wolf can borrow a blazer. “A wolf in sheep’s clothing” still prowls.

Yet I cannot fully dismiss the discipline of dressing up. There is something about putting on a tie that tells my brain, “Today matters.” There is something about polished shoes that reminds me I am a professional, even when I’m limping across a playground.

Watching those robotics mentors in jeans, focused, joyful, effective, made me wonder if we have confused polish with purpose. Maybe professionalism is less about starch and more about posture. Less about lapels and more about leadership.

Maybe the real uniform is consistency. Presence. Competence. Care. Maybe “Sunday best” isn’t about the fabric at all, it’s about the intention. Maybe the deeper Catholic instinct behind uniforms was never about suppressing individuality. Maybe it was about leveling the field.

Khakis or quarter-zips. Cartoon tie or conservative silk. Goodwill suit or no tie at all. The question isn’t whether ties are passé. The question might be: “What are we trying to say?” Are we saying it with integrity?

Maybe I’ll keep wearing my ties, but I won’t require them of everyone else. I’ve seen men in Goodwill suits honor a friend beautifully. I’ve seen teachers in jeans shape minds with excellence. I’ve seen middle schoolers test the theological boundaries of “solid navy.”

If I can break up a kickball dispute in khakis and a bow tie, and a robotics mentor can inspire future engineers in a quarter-zip and sneakers, perhaps professionalism isn’t stitched into the fabric after all.

“Clothes make the man,” they say. Maybe clothes introduce you. Character keeps you relevant. If every girl is crazy ’bout a sharp-dressed man, as ZZ Top once reminded us… Well, I suppose I’ll keep a few sharp ties in rotation. Just in case.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Inclusion - Giving Students What They Need to Succeed

I officially surrendered my man card the day I said, “I do,” back in 1987.  Apparently, there are no returns. Yesterday I wept in my office. Not the dignified, single-tear kind of weeping. I’m talking full-on, reach-for-the-Kleenex, thank-God-the-door-is-closed weeping. We had just told a parent—whose child is on the spectrum—that we believe in her son, and we want him to stay at our school. Those words cost us something. They cost planning. They cost resources. They cost energy. But they didn’t cost us our mission. And here’s the irony: this conversation came on the heels of another one where I had to tell a “potential family” that we didn’t believe our school was the right fit for their children. Same day. Same office. Same principal. Two completely different outcomes. If you’ve ever wondered whether there’s an internal battle between a principal’s head and heart, let me assure you—it’s not theoretical. It’s daily. And sometimes it’s exhausting. Like most of my blogs, there’s a b...

On Humanity, Rumor, and the Discipline of Decency

Every so often, the world reminds us, sometimes gently, sometimes with a jolt, that God’s plan for us still runs through the old, unfashionable virtues: love, charity, humility, friendship. Not as slogans. As practices. Lately, the reminder hasn’t come through a clear, verified tragedy so much as through the way we react to rumor, outrage, and one another. In an age where headlines race ahead of facts and partisanship outpaces compassion, the simplest test of our humanity may be this: Do we refuse to cheer the suffering, real or rumored, of those we disagree with? I think about friendship across differences. Actor James Woods once said of director Rob Reiner that political differences never stood in the way of their love and respect for each other. Reiner fought for Woods when others wouldn’t. They worked together. They remained friends. That’s how it is in the real world, or at least how it should be. You don’t have to agree to stay human. I also think about families who live with add...

Reigniting the Fire: From Embers to Flame

  There’s a moment in an interview with Michael Franti that’s stayed with me. He spoke about how a roaring fire, once reduced to embers, doesn’t need much to come alive again, just a gentle breath, a little attention, a whisper of wind. And suddenly, the flame returns. That image, embers waiting patiently for someone to believe in their potential, feels deeply personal. Franti once said, “I think of love as an action. Finding something that’s outside of yourself, to serve someone else’s soul, helping to ignite someone else’s spirit, to bring about ease of heart and joy, serenity in somebody else.” That quote reminds me that reigniting a fire, whether in us or in others, is about connection. It’s about showing up, listening, and offering warmth when someone feels cold inside. Not long ago, I found myself in a place I never expected to be. The fire inside me had dimmed. Life hadn’t knocked me down in one dramatic blow; it had chipped away, little by little. Leadership challen...